12.12.2006
BELARUS: RELIGIOUS FREEDOM SURVEY, DECEMBER 2006


By Geraldine Fagan, Forum 18 News Service

"Killing a frog by warming up the water very gradually" is how one
Belarusian Protestant describes the state's religious policy. He notes
that the first religious organisations to be closed down in August 2005 as
a result of the restrictive 2002 Religion Law - Pastor Ernest Sabilo's
Belarusian Evangelical Church and Pastor Lyavon Lipen's Belarusian
Evangelical Reformed Church - are small and independent. So too is
Christ's Covenant Reformed Baptist Church, whose pastor, Georgi Vyazovsky,
was given a ten-day prison sentence in March 2006 - the first for religious
activity on Belarusian territory since the demise of the Soviet Union.
Without public prominence or a larger umbrella association to act in their
defence, the Protestant points out, these churches made easy initial
targets. "When Sabilo had problems, some people said 'Why protect him?' as
they saw him as the 'wrong' kind of Baptist," a member of Vyazovsky's
church explained to Forum 18. "I said 'Today it's Sabilo, tomorrow it will
be us.' And it was."

The incremental growth in restrictions under President Aleksandr
Lukashenko - particularly in the wake of the 2002 Religion Law - has in
many respects brought Belarusian believers back to the late Soviet period.
They are legally able to practise religion in community only with express
permission from the state. Under the 2002 Law, religious communities must
be registered with the state, for which they require state-approved,
non-residential premises. All public events outside these premises must be
approved in advance by the state under the 2003 Demonstrations Law. Legal
provisions typically combine to make nothing possible. Denied compulsory
re-registration because of the impossibility of securing state-approved
worship premises in Minsk, for example, the charismatic New Life Church
was denied state permission to import religious literature in August 2005.

The state's demands of religious communities are not just simple
bureaucratic procedures, which some communities are failing to comply with
due to incompetence or intransigence. As one Protestant points out, "They
have created conditions so you can't live by the Law. We would need to
close half our churches in order to operate technically in accordance with
the Law." Religious believers may encounter obstruction from the moment
they seek to organise their activity. Baptists, Pentecostals and the
Russian Orthodox Church Abroad all report routine state intimidation of
those who agree to include their personal details as the founders of a new
religious organisation, such as by threatening to withhold a share in a
village tractor or livestock. In official documents, one senior official
even insists openly that Orthodox should be dissuaded from affiliation to
the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, criticising junior officials "who have
found neither the time nor the opportunity to influence these believers or
to assist the local priest in returning them to the fold of the [Moscow
Patriarchate] church."

Particularly in the capital Minsk, Protestants and Hare Krishna devotees
report the following phenomenon. Once they have located suitable premises
for rent - a difficult task in a Soviet-planned city where religious
activity is not permitted in cultural or educational institutions - and
included the address as part of the compulsory registration procedure, the
landlord suddenly withdraws consent citing state pressure. Officials may
also refuse to allow even a legal address to be registered at particular
premises. A pastor of the Baptist Union, for example, was this year
refused permission to register a new community's legal address at his
home, on the grounds that this would be detrimental to his children and
that the building has no outside electric light. Krishna devotees
complained to the United Nations Human Rights Committee, after similarly
being told that they could not register the legal address of an umbrella
association at premises in Minsk due to alleged fire-safety and sanitation
violations. The UN Committee upheld their complaint, pointing out that
"appropriate premises [for worship] could be obtained subsequent to
registration," but the Belarusian government defended its decision in
2006, arguing that it was justified under Belarusian law.

Without republic-wide association status, Krishna devotees do not have the
right to establish monasteries, missions and educational institutions or
invite foreign citizens to Belarus to preach or conduct other religious
activity. In September 2006, the Independent Evangelical-Lutheran Church
in the Republic of Belarus was likewise refused registration as a
republic-wide association, due to "technical problems" in its application.

Without state registration, religious communities are liable to a fine
under a Soviet-era provision of the Administrative Violations Code. Up
until two years ago, such fines were usually relatively low - typically
33,000 Belarusian Roubles (105 Norwegian Kroner, 13 Euros or 15 US
Dollars) - and for the most part encountered by congregations of the
Council of Churches Baptists, who refuse on theological grounds to
register with any state authorities in the former Soviet Union. They and
other unregistered independent Protestant churches reported 17 such fines
over the period 2003/4. While the analogous figure for 2005/6 is 12, the
fines have on several occasions been significantly higher - 150,000
Belarusian Roubles (438 Norwegian Kroner, 56 Euros or 72 US Dollars),
240,000 Belarusian Roubles (698 Norwegian Kroner, 86 Euros or 111 US
Dollars) and 580,000 Belarusian Roubles (1,767 Norwegian Kroner, 223 Euros
or 270 US Dollars). The average monthly wage in Belarus is estimated to be
around 303,000 Belarusian Roubles (885 Norwegian Kroner, 108 Euros or 139
US Dollars).

Also during the period 2005/6, the pastor and administrator of New Life
Church were given fines for unsanctioned religious activity totalling
11,897,000 Belarusian Roubles (34,828 Norwegian Kroner, 4,370 Euros or
5,455 US Dollars), a Pentecostal church fines totalling 5,930,000
Belarusian Roubles (19,553 Norwegian Kroner, 2,166 Euros or 2,767 US
Dollars) and members of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad fines totalling
4,152,000 Belarusian Roubles (12,320 Norwegian Kroner, 1,582 Euros or 1,857
US Dollars). Orthodox communities outside the Belarusian Orthodox Church
(Moscow Patriarchate) have been denied official status, and the worship
building of one autonomous Orthodox parish was even bulldozed by the
authorities in 2002.

Muslim and Jewish communities, however, have told Forum 18 that their home
meetings, while technically illegal, are not subject to state scrutiny. It
thus remains unclear to what extent illegal home worship meetings are
targeted. One young Protestant points out that many Soviet-generation
pastors do not bother to publicise relatively small fines, as they were
used to more frequent and harsher prosecution in their youth. Senior state
representatives appear keen to enforce this part of the Administrative
Code, however: one regional religious affairs official complained to his
subordinates in a 2005 report about the low prosecution rate of those
involved in unregistered Baptist meetings.

Despite tight restrictions on missionary activity in the highly
restrictive Religion Law - and with state approval for such activity hard
to obtain - religious believers have managed to share their faith in
public through popular music. In what seems to be a unique phenomenon in
the former Soviet Union, Forum 18 has found that faith-inspired musicians
have achieved broad public support. Christian bands often appear on state
television's pop music programmes and several Hare Krishna groups - among
them rap artists - have also performed at a prestigious music festival.
Asked by Forum 18 whether the prevalence of religious themes in Belarusian
popular music might be the consequence of extensive state restrictions on
organised church activity, one lead singer of a Christian band remarked
"if they try to stop God one way, we'll try another".

Apparently due to heightened political tension during the presidential
election period, punishment for unsanctioned religious events became
harsher during the spring of 2006. Previously given only an official
warning, Pastor Georgi Vyazovsky was imprisoned for ten days, as was
religious freedom lawyer Sergei Shavtsov. A Pentecostal bishop, Sergei
Tsvor, was spared a possibly similar fate only due to the expiry of the
legal deadline for his prosecution. In March/April 2006, Minsk's Hassidic
Jews were also refused permission to hold their Purim and Passover
celebrations, which went ahead without obstruction in the rest of the
country. November 2005 amendments to the Criminal Code - which have yet to
be enforced - now punish the organisation or leadership of a religious
organisation found to "harm the rights, freedoms and legal interests of
citizens, or prevent their fulfilment of state, social or family duties"
with imprisonment for up to three years.

The fact that three massive fines totalling 5,930,000 Belarusian Roubles
(19,553 Norwegian Kroner, 2,166 Euros or 2,767 US Dollars) were imposed on
a registered Pentecostal church, for holding unsanctioned open-air baptisms
in 2005/6, indicates that registration does not guarantee full religious
freedom. This looks set to be increasingly the case, particularly in the
property sphere. Several Protestant representatives have told Forum 18
that a high proportion of registered churches own prayer houses which are
not legally houses of worship or else are not fully documented. One
referred to "a lovely large meeting hall" which is "a ruin on paper". At
another Protestant church, which the authorities refuse to approve as fit
for use, staff quickly leave their office just before regular state
check-ups and do not install furniture properly to avoid prosecution.
Protestant representatives fear that, in future, there will be more
systematic moves to restrict registered churches, such as by forcing those
in free-standing residential buildings (currently possible with state
approval) to change those premises' legal status via an onerous
bureaucratic procedure, or by issuing burdensome tax demands. A December
2005 presidential decree relieving religious organisations from land and
property tax extends only to official houses of worship and the land
supporting them.

Protestants also complain that securing permission to build new churches
is virtually impossible. In Minsk, city planners reportedly are not
planning to grant any such permissions until 2030. Protestant churches in
the capital also report being treated as commercial organisations with
regard to the City Development Fund, to which those seeking to buy or
build property are asked to pay a one-off sum determined by the city
authorities, estimated by different sources as equivalent to hundreds of
thousands of Dollars.

This requirement is not enforced against all religious communities. Muslim
representative Mufti Abu-Bekir Shabanovich, whose community is currently
building a mosque in Minsk with Saudi Arabian funding, told Forum 18 that
it has not had to donate anything to the Fund. He commented that the
presence of a mosque in the capital is important for Belarus' relations
with the Islamic world.

The state's tendency to pick up on religious communities' "irregularities"
means that some feel obliged to keep a low profile. One Catholic
representative, for example, told Forum 18 how a parish voluntarily closed
down an educational programme, which did not have official approval, for
fear of harassment. In Minsk, Krishna devotees appear to have arrived at
an unofficial compromise: They have not been disturbed for over a year by
the city authorities - despite not having the right to use their own
building for worship - but they have also ceased all visible public
activity, such as street processions and book distribution.

The state's different treatment of different faiths is not random. While
Minsk officials claim that Krishna devotees and New Life Church are simply
violators of the law and dealt with accordingly, 1997 and 2000 reports by
state religious affairs specialists brand the Society for Krishna
Consciousness "a destructive totalitarian sect" and one of New Life's
fellow Full Gospel congregations "a neo-mystical religious-political
destructive sect" whose growth poses "a significant threat to the
individual, society and state".

Together with 1996 amendments to the Constitution, the 2002 Religion Law
regulates the state's treatment of religious organisations according to
their historical influence. President Aleksandr Lukashenko has repeatedly
affirmed his support for the Belarusian Orthodox Church (Moscow
Patriarchate) - whose leadership endorsed the 2002 Law - as "the basis of
our faith", "the most important origin of correct decision-making at state
level" and, prospectively, "one of the most important pillars of our
state". While the Belarusian Orthodox Church does not encounter the
obstacles experienced by out-of-favour groups and has received state
backing for church construction and religious education, it is affected by
some provisions in the 2002 Law, however, such as the minimum requirement
of 20 members for a new community and a ban on the use of state school
premises, even outside school hours.

One important reason for the state's relative eagerness to exert control
over religious communities is its preservation of an extensive Soviet-era
religious affairs bureaucracy. As well as a Plenipotentiary for Religious
and Ethnic Affairs and four staff in Minsk (until July 2006 the State
Committee for Religious and Ethnic Affairs) and one or two religious
affairs officials in each of the country's six regions plus Minsk city,
each district (approximately 20 per region) has a Department for Relations
with Religious and Social Organisations and a Commission for Monitoring
Compliance with Legislation on Religion.

A Soviet-style anti-religious attitude is particularly strong in the
educational sphere. After celebrating Purim in an optional class on Jewish
culture and traditions for Jewish children at a state kindergarten in 2006,
a music teacher was accused by a district public prosecutor of "illegal and
deliberate dissemination of religious dogma to young children, which could
cause considerable harm to their world view, rights and legal interests."
A 2002 state textbook teaches that Baptists, Pentecostals, Adventists and
Jehovah's Witnesses are "sects" encouraging fanaticism, that Krishna
devotees need psychiatric help and that Orthodox worship induces a
hypnotic state. State officials have rejected religious leaders'
complaints about such schoolbooks.

Older school pupils have told Forum 18 that those of approximately 13 and
younger - who have been in the education system while the state's
anti-Protestant stance has become more pronounced - regard their
charismatic church as a "sect", whereas their contemporaries are neutral.
While the state-promoted Belarusian Republican Youth Union is also
negatively inclined towards Protestant churches, the authorities tend to
discourage faith-based youth work. In early 2006, the Ministry of Justice
closed down Generation, whose Christian leaders had run English-language
summer camps. Numerous checks by local state departments on one Baptist
youth summer camp in 2006 "made it impossible for us to work," according
to one pastor. Also this summer, local authorities forcibly returned to
Minsk a group of church families camping together in private grounds,
claiming that their holiday was an event requiring state permission. Some
teachers try to identify and threaten those pupils who attend Baptist
Sunday schools, as in the Soviet period.

Recently the state appears to have become particularly keen to restrict
Protestant activity as a potential political threat. One Protestant points
out that, with independent political, business and social organisations
crushed in turn, evangelical churches, as the largest remaining social
organisations, are now in the frontline, especially as their belief in the
priesthood of all believers means that "each individual Protestant is a
potential activist". The situation is not in fact clear-cut, however.
While a number of prominent opposition activists are committed
Protestants, an undetermined proportion of evangelicals are said to be
broadly content with the current regime, "except for the persecution".
Particularly during election periods, the state discourages religious
leaders from engaging in political activity.

A foreign Protestant, who used to work in the humanitarian aid sphere in
Belarus, has suggested to Forum 18 that he was denied a visa because his
partnership with Christian churches involved teaching "responsibility, a
change of attitude - that it is not Jesus' example to sit down and accept
what happens in your community". Western contact appears to be another
reason for the state's particularly negative attitude towards Protestants.
In recent years several Protestant communities have been refused permission
to invite foreigners to work with them. In addition, two Polish Catholic
priests were refused permission to renew their annual visas in 2005, and
12 more priests and nuns in 2006. A 1999 Council of Ministers decree
restricts a foreign citizen's professional religious activity to specific
state-approved premises. The transfer of a foreign religious worker from
one organisation to another - such as between parishes - requires state
permission, even for a single service. In this way, a Polish Catholic
priest was detained after serving Mass while passing through Minsk in
September 2006.

In a Catholic weblog discussion, a parishioner present at the Mass noted
that the man and woman in plain clothes who accused the priest of
violating the law "are always sitting in our church". Similar anecdotal
evidence suggests that Soviet-style observation of religious communities
by the secret police is commonplace. In late 2004, for instance, KGB
secret police officers interrupted a service at a Baptist church when two
foreign citizens stood in for a pastor without state permission. More
recently, a Pentecostal told Forum 18 that the local KGB warned an
Orthodox friend not to meet with him by claiming that "Pentecostals are
controlled by foreign money and that for attracting two people into my
church I would get a car." There have been reports of the KGB seeking to
recruit members of religious communities as informers.

The Belarusian KGB secret police - which has not changed its name since
Soviet times - has made no attempt to distance itself from its Soviet past
and proudly traces its history back to the first Soviet secret police, the
Cheka. In the 1920s "Chekists stood shoulder to shoulder with the entire
Belarusian people in resolving the most difficult and pressing economic
and social tasks before them," its official website maintains, before
claiming that the organisation was actually a victim of Stalin's purges in
the 1930s: "23,000 Chekists were repressed - the very best professionals,
moreover, [Felix] Dzerzhinsky's comrades, outstanding people with rich and
sensitive souls, selflessly serving the Motherland and fighting for a
bright future for their country."

Revived in 2003, state Ideology Departments are sometimes also involved in
the close monitoring of religious communities. In 2005/6 local ideology
officials broke up a seminar on family life led by a Baptist and
threatened a Russian Orthodox Church Abroad priest with two weeks'
imprisonment or a large fine for "illegal religious activity".

As state pressure steadily mounts, however, Forum 18 observes that
religious believers are increasingly putting aside their confessional
differences in organised resistance. Most recently, a variety of
Protestant churches joined in support of New Life Church's hunger-strike
in defence of its property. Catholics in the town of Grodno [Hrodna], who
also prayed for New Life, drew on that community's example in turn by
declaring their own hunger-strike for permission to build a new church.

Such initiatives appear exceptional within the former Soviet Union, but
Belarusians typically do not regard their religious differences as
divisions. Several have suggested to Forum 18 that any insistence upon
affiliation to a particular confession (or none) is characteristic of
successive historical attempts by external powers to manipulate the
Belarusian people. Instead, they point to a passage in one of the earliest
legal declarations of religious freedom and tolerance, chapter 3, article 3
of the 1588 Statute of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (which included the
territory of present-day Belarus): "And if there should be significant
difference in the Christian faith, we vow to ourselves and to our
descendants for all time, under oath, on our faith, dignity and
conscience, that those who differ in faith will keep peace with one
another."